First of all, here’s a grad school update: accepted at Stanford, Michigan, UCLA; rejected from Princeton; still waiting for responses from five more places. Unfortunately, Stanford and Michigan have their open houses at the same time, so I will not be going to Michigan’s. UCLA is looking very tempting right now, but my reasons for determining these things are so bad: on Tuesday I was browsing around on the UCLA math website, and I found that they have a seminar devoted to proving this theorem: Given a positive definite integral quadratic form, every positive integer is representable if and only if 1, 2, 3, …, 290 are representable(!!!). I think that any school that has seminars devoted to proving such incredible theorems have to be taken very seriously. (I imagine it shouldn’t take much to convince me that my decision-making procedures are extremely bad.)

For the first time in college, I really think I might be taking too many courses this quarter (eight I’m actually taking, and then I’m auditing one on the history and philosophy of CCS). I don’t have a problem getting my work done; rather, I have problem concentrating during all the lectures. It is rather embarrassing to realize in the middle of a lecture that I haven’t been paying attention to anything that was said in the past fifteen minutes. It’s even more embarrassing that I’m one of my computer science professor’s favorite students, so sometimes when he’s not doing a very good job of explaining something, he asks me if I understand/can explain it. I don’t really want him to know that I tune out the boring bits! Naturally, the first class of each day (algebraic topology on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays; elliptic curves on Tuesdays and Thursdays) always get my full attention; is it any surprise that these classes are my favorites (other than the history and philosophy of CCS class, which generally manages to keep my attention despite its hideous time)?

My Aristotle class, on the other hand, is really boring. Don’t philosophers have better things to do than to quibble about minute semantic points? It’s all completely content-free. Aristotle may have been a very clever man, but he didn’t really say anything at all. Do nonmathematicians find mathematics as nitpicky as I find philosophy? I really can’t understand why such trivial details could be of interest to anyone, but there do seem to be philosophy majors and people like that in the world.

My computer has been extremely unwell for the past three weeks. (It’s unlikely to survive longer than half an hour without giving me a BSOD, and reverting to factory conditions + data disk did nothing to help the situation; in addition, when I try to turn it on, most of the time the lights flash, but it doesn’t actually boot.) While this is very frustrating, it has also been very helpful in some ways. There are actually more things to do than I thought without a computer. (Okay, so it’s not hard to find computers to use, and I even installed MikTeX on one of them, but it’s much easier to waste time on my own computer.) Yesterday I went to a meeting/interview thing with a candidate for a CCS lecturer in computer science. I figured after going through all this stuff last year for the math faculty, I could contribute something. Maybe that was the case; maybe it wasn’t. But at any rate I had fun participating. On the other hand, there’s also a lot more potential to be bored without a computer. Perhaps it’s just as well that the computer had to crash during such a busy quarter. At any rate, it’s definitely going back to Fry’s in two weeks.

On Thursday Agboola recommended that we watch a video of Jean-Pierre Serre lecturing on how to write mathematics badly, and I watched it yesterday. Here is a link. I had a lot of fun watching it. It’s mostly not very technical.


About Simon

Hi. I'm Simon Rubinstein-Salzedo. I'm a mathematics postdoc at Dartmouth College. I'm also a musician; I play piano and cello, and I also sometimes compose music and study musicology. I also like to play chess and write calligraphy. This blog is a catalogue of some of my thoughts. I write them down so that I understand them better. But sometimes other people find them interesting as well, so I happily share them with my small corner of the world.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to

  1. goreism says:

    I don’t know, are you referring to things like the problem of universals? Welcome to Aristotle read through the lens of analytic philosophy.

  2. okb says:

    Yeah, that’s a bad way to decide between grad programs. I mean, you’re totally ignoring the question of how many hot chyx there are at each school.

    • Simon says:

      Thanks for the sound advice.

      • andronikus says:

        Not to be the cynical one, but another thing you should consider is how much money each school is offering you, and how much you can talk them up to. (Up to how much you can talk them?) Because, you know, how much money you’re getting affects how many hot chyx you can get.

  3. Anonymous says:

    290 Theorem
    I think the UCLA seminar is about a number theory problem that might be solved, due largely to the work of Manjul Bhagarav’s work on the 15 theorem.

    • Simon says:

      Re: 290 Theorem
      Yes, this is true. By “proving this theorem,” I meant “students go through the proof of this theorem.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s